Search results for "Life sustaining treatment"

showing 2 items of 2 documents

An ethical algorithm for rationing life sustaining treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic

2020

The burning ethical question raised by the COVID-19 pandemic is how to deal fairly and ethically with a large number of patients simultaneously becoming critically unwell. Across the world, in both developed and developing countries, health systems are grappling with the possibility or the reality that the demand for intensive medical care will outstrip availability. There is a need for ethical guidelines on how to allocate treatment, but such guidelines are potentially highly controversial.1 In this commentary, we set out a simple algorithm (Figure 1), including what we take to be the essential ethical principles that ought to guide resource allocation in any country or setting as well as …

Economic growth2019-20 coronavirus outbreakCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)utilitarianismPneumonia Viralresource allocationPersonal autonomyArticledecision makingSettore MED/02 - Storia Della MedicinaBetacoronavirusQuality of life (healthcare)Life sustaining treatmentSettore MED/43 - Medicina LegalePandemicHumansMedicinePandemicsSARS-CoV-2business.industryRationingCOVID-19ethicsTriageAnesthesiology and Pain MedicinePersonal AutonomyQuality of LifeethicprognosisCoronavirus InfectionsbusinesstriageAlgorithmsprognosi
researchProduct

Withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining therapy in older adults (≥ 80 years) admitted to the intensive care unit

2018

PURPOSE: To document and analyse the decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment (LST) in a population of very old patients admitted to the ICU. METHODS: This prospective study included intensive care patients aged ≥ 80 years in 309 ICUs from 21 European countries with 30-day mortality follow-up. RESULTS: LST limitation was identified in 1356/5021 (27.2%) of patients: 15% had a withholding decision and 12.2% a withdrawal decision (including those with a previous withholding decision). Patients with LST limitation were older, more frail, more severely ill and less frequently electively admitted. Patients with withdrawal of LST were more frequently male and had a longer ICU len…

Malemedicine.medical_treatmentHSJ UCICritical Care and Intensive Care Medicinelaw.inventionLife sustaining treatment0302 clinical medicineElderlylaw80 and overMedicine030212 general & internal medicineProspective StudiesProspective cohort studyAged 80 and overeducation.field_of_studyWithholding Treatmentddc:617[SDV.MHEP.GEG]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Geriatry and gerontologyWithholdingIntensive care unit3. Good healthEuropeagedIntensive Care UnitsWithdrawalSOFA scoreHumanmedicine.medical_specialtyethical aspectsPopulationIntensive Care UnitDecision MakingElderly; Ethics; Intensive care; Life sustaining treatment; Withdrawal; Withholding;life-sustaining therapyNO03 medical and health sciencesIntensive careAnesthesiologyHumansEthiceducationMechanical ventilationEthicsbusiness.industry030208 emergency & critical care medicineElderly; Ethics; Intensive care; Life sustaining treatment; Withdrawal; Withholdingcritical careLife Support CareProspective StudieWithholding TreatmentIntensive careEmergency medicineElderly; Ethics; Intensive care; Life sustaining treatment; Withdrawal; Withholding; Aged 80 and over; Decision Making; Europe; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Male; Prospective Studies; Life Support Care; Withholding Treatmentbusiness
researchProduct